HOMILY FOR THE THIRD SUNDAY OF EASTER, YEAR A
Rev.
Fr. Ezekoka Peter Onyekachi
It was not really easy
when I chose this topic as the topic of our reflection today. I searched
through the Strong’s Concordance of the Bible to discover what the Bible tells
us about the city Emmaus, only to be disappointed that it only appeared once in
the whole of the Bible, and that is in the Gospel of today (Luke 24:13-35). So,
I asked myself: what do I do now? It
immediately crossed my mind that Strong did not exhaust the whole of the Bible;
the Deutero-canonical books are not part of his consideration. So, I opened my
New Jerusalem Bible to scan through the Deutero-canonical Books; lo and behold,
I found a twin to the Gospel of Luke 24 in 1 Macabbees 4; Emmaus was mentioned.
As I read through it, many questions came to me. Indeed, these questions form
the bedrock of my reflection on the Emmaus Experience.
WHY
EMMAUS?
Why were the disciples
going to Emmaus? It is most probable that Emmaus was their native city or at
least their city of residence. We must not forget that the Passover had just
ended; the great national feast that attracted many Jews to Jerusalem. Since, the
week of Passover had just been concluded it was highly probable that everyone
was returning to his city of residence to continue work after the Sabbath day. This
is where we come to understand fully that this incident happened on the first
day of the week, which is the Sunday after the Sabbath Saturday. Thus, people
returned home to their working places to continue with their daily routine. Cleopas
and his friend were also among these people that were returning home, though
they were different. They were disciples of Christ, and the passion of Christ
must have touched them so much. As they returned, they discussed their experiences,
the early apparitions of the morning, and the stories told by the women and the
apostles. However, they did this like people who had lost hope and whose zeal
has been shattered about the liberation that the Messiah would bring. They had
thought him to be a great prophet and a great redeemer. But, what type of redemption were they thinking
about? Why was Jesus interested in these people heading to Emmaus? These questions
can only be cleared if we go back to an aspect of the historicity of the city,
Emmaus.
The only explicit
mention apart from the gospel of Luke and apart from the exegetical
connotations to the Hebrew name Hamat concerning
the city of Emmaus was in the 1st book of Maccabees (as clarified
above). It is mentioned here in the context of the Jewish revolt against the Hellenistic
Syrian King Antiochus IV. The king of Syria struggled to unify his empire (ca.
167-151BC), profited from factions within Judaism to try to stamp out the
Jewish way of life. This attempt is known as hellenization; that is, to impose
a Greek-style religion and culture on other cultures. The attempt made by this
king met serious opposition, led by Mattathias and his sons (a priestly family
from a small village) who soon became known as the Maccabees or hammers. They were
known to have had such reckless courage and faith in the unfailing help of God.
The fourth chapter of the first book of Maccabees (which is one of the
deuterocanonical books of the Bible) spoke about a battle that was fought in
Emmaus. In Emmaus was an army to guide against the Judaist faith from being practiced. A man named Judas was leading the Jewish army as a
man named Gorgias was leading the Gentile army. The army of Gorgias outwitted
the army of Judas by number and armoury, but Judas pitched his faith in the
Lord and advised his army not to panic, but to recount how Yahweh delivered
them from the hands of Pharaoh during the crossing of the red sea. They called
on the Lord, and moved in for battle and defeated Gorgias and his gentile army.
Gorgias fled with his remaining troop far away. Judas and his army then
returned chanting songs of praise to heaven (cf. 1 Mac. 4:1-27).
We can now imagine the
type of redemption the people of Emmaus dreamt for. It was barely 150 years
after the Maccabean revolt, and thus the war and its effects were still fresh
in their memories. Having stamped out their love for their religious freedom
many years ago, they expected a Messiah who would fight for and gain their
political freedom. These people from Emmaus can be understood as deeply
religious. The fact that the battle ground against any religious invasion was
in that city gives credit to this allusion. Surely, the inhabitants of the city
joined the fight and helped to destroy Gorgian and his troops because of their
love for Yahweh. And when the Messiah came who they expected to be the one that
will give them the political freedom and solidify their religious freedom, it
could be imagined that many from that city would easily give in as His
disciples. Therefore, apart from the fact that they were the disciples of
Jesus, we must also state that there was an enabling ground for the meeting of
Jesus with these disciples. They would understand him more because of the
history connected to Emmaus and because of their knowledge of the Scriptures,
which only needed to be expanded. Jesus interpreted the Scriptures to them and
they kept on understanding.
Grace builds on nature,
and perfects it. For us to understand the workings of God, we must develop
great love and zeal for Him. We expect God to always come into our situations
without been disposed. We expect God to visit us when we have failed to give
him our address. God desires that we show courage in our belief of him. He disregards
cowardice. Indeed, the courage inherent in the history of this people of Emmaus
was noticed, but in a more luminous and loquacious manner in the speech of
Peter in the First Reading (Acts 2:14.22-33) wherein he exacerbated with great
aura of decidedness the power of the resurrection of Christ. The courage of
Peter was got from the power of the resurrection where as the courage of the
inhabitants of Emmaus was got from their exclusive love for Judaism and for
freedom. But the greatest expression of freedom was the freedom from the shackles
of death which is resurrection. The power that ensued from this freedom ignited
in Peter the message that he released to the inhabitants of Jerusalem the power
that creates peace and not the power that seeks war.
FROM
JERUSALEM TO EMMAUS AND BACK TO JERUSALEM
Cleopas and his
companion must have felt disappointed. Their hopes and dreams were shattered. Remember,
they said: we were hoping that he was the one who was going to rescue Israel.
Jesus came suddenly and talked with them, and dispelled the darkness that
beclouded their minds. Their minds were open but their eyes were not. They seem
to have needed another encounter for their spiritual eyes to open as well for
the Messianic knowledge. The Eucharist is the point of ultimate divine
revelatory encounter which comes after the liturgy of the word. We must stress
it here that any gathering without the Eucharist does not qualify as Holy Mass.
Holy Mass must flow from the Word to the Eucharist for the deep encounter to be
made. The Eucharist is the sacrament of unity. Immediately the bread was broken
and their eyes were opened, they sought once more the company of the apostles.
That was why Jesus
wanted these disciples not to remain in Emmaus because in Emmaus you seek
freedom but in the wrong way, but going back to Jerusalem (the home of peace),
you seek freedom in the most perfect way. Hence, it was at the breaking of the
bread that they recognized it was Jesus, and hurried back to Jerusalem, the
home of the apostles which is the home of unity. Divine revelation is meant for
unity, and never for disunity. They had tried to leave the home which signified
unity for Emmaus most probably to continue their normal life. But Jesus through
the revelation of Himself to them sends them back to Jerusalem to testify to
the power of the resurrection and to bear his witnesses to him. The Christian message
is never fully ours until it is shared with some others. This message was
necessary for the apostles that they may be glued more to one another in
courage and confidence of the power of their master; that sort of confidence
the first epistle of Peter (1:17-21) talks about in the Second Reading.
Many of us have left
Jerusalem for places which do not promote Christian unity, and do not enhance the
unity we needed to have shared with our family members (like Cleopas and his
companion left for Emmaus). Many of us have even failed to give Jesus the
opportunity to walk with us so as to enlighten us (unlike Cleopas and his
companion). Many of us have blocked our eyes consciously to disregard Jesus
even as he reveals himself to us in the breaking of the bread (unlike Cleopas
and his companion). Many of us have decided never to proclaim Christ by words
and deeds (unlike Cleopas and his companion who hurried proclaimed Him). Many have
also decided never to rejoin the Church after having experienced revelation,
and instead gone to spread the news of their experience in their own way and
their chosen cities (unlike Cleopas and his companion who went straight back to
Jerusalem to tell the story in the company of the apostles). The Emmaus
experience must make us to work for our freedom from sin and death. It makes us
to regain the courage which may have been taken away from us out of
intimidation. It leads us to appreciate the Scriptures and to be disposed for
the knowledge of the Scriptures. Finally, the Emmaus experience must make us to
work for Christian unity, in the awareness that divine revelation is at the
service of the unity of the people of God and not for selfish aggrandizement.
May God give us the grace of this Emmaus experience this week and ever. Amen.
Happy new week. God bless you.